He explains his theory by examining the technology of cinema. He argues that cinema was not born from the technology advancement but rather from innate desire to reproduce the realism of our world. Stop Using Plagiarized Content. What Bazin means is that the invention of technology was not to gain profit rather to replicate and reproduce our real world on screen. Though he does argue that some were in it for the profit of the technology.
|Published (Last):||3 November 2004|
|PDF File Size:||3.33 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.86 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
According to Bazin, film is inclined to, and again best when, realist in aesthetic. In this article I will explore their claims that the aesthetic of realism is a reliance on the status quo and an aesthetic implicitly reliant on ideological cultural dominants. Film is made to be sold. Film is an art that is also primarily a source of income and export: film is explicitly a commercial product.
However film, according to Comolli and Narboni, is also implicitly the product of the ideology that dominates the field, or place, it was constructed in. A film-maker, according to Comolli and Narboni, cannot change the economic circumstance, or system they find themselves in [if they could would it be the film business anymore anyway?
The realist aesthetic fails to comprehensively challenge or explore the structures of the dominant forces and world-view in society and art — which cannot challenge or explore sexist, racist or fascistic ideologies — is a blank critique and an utterly redundant social activity; art without the ability to challenge or explore social attitudes is not really art at all.
They argue for the utilization of techniques which upset the viewers ability to accept the supposedly unadulterated reality of the world depicted. Rather than quickly explore the counter-arguments a critic who favours the realist aesthetic would raise I will leave that duty to Bazin, whose position I will continue to explore in the coming weeks and months.
Hollows, P. Hutchings, M. Posted on.
Pages: 3 Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals. He explains his theory by examining the technology of cinema. He argues that cinema was not born from the technology advancement but rather from innate desire to reproduce the realism of our world. What Bazin means is that the invention of technology was not to gain profit rather to replicate and reproduce our real world on screen. Though he does argue that some were in it for the profit of the technology. Inventors of photography and cinema thought about what they will show and reproduce primarily to how they will achieve the reality of the world.
Tag: Andre Bazin
Life[ edit ] Bazin was born in Angers , France , in He met future film and television producer Janine while working at Labour and Culture, a militant organization associated with the French Communist party during WWII and eventually they both married in with a son named Florent afterwards. Bazin was a major force in post-World War II film studies and criticism. What is Cinema? A selection from this collection was translated into English and published in two volumes in the late s and early s. They became mainstays of film courses in the English-speaking world, but were never updated or revised.
André Bazin, What is Cinema? 1945